This dashboard is an interactive map marking news stories about integrity in healthcare across the globe. We want you to explore what's happening worldwide and in your area using our filters. Our aim is simple - to show the scale and complexity of integrity issues in health and its many forms around the globe.

The tool brings together thousands of news stories about healthcare integrity, categorized by type and location. You can explore specific forms of integrity issues - from fraud and bribery to sexual exploitation and conflicts of interest. Each dot on the map represents a real case reported in the media, letting you see patterns and hotspots while diving into the details of individual stories.

We've designed this to be a starting point for understanding healthcare integrity in your region or globally. While we've gathered as much data as we could (see our notes on data coverage), we know this isn't the complete picture. Some cases don't make the news, others might be reported in languages we don't yet cover, and press freedom varies greatly between countries.

You can search, rank and filter the information easily. Want to focus on a specific country? Type it in. Interested in particular types of corruption? Use our filters. Need to analyze the data yourself? Download everything in CSV format. The power is in your hands to explore and understand this crucial issue.

Whether you're a researcher, journalist, healthcare professional, or concerned citizen, we hope this tool helps you better understand how integrity issues affect healthcare systems around the world.

We get our stories from thousands of online news outlets globally through our partner Newscatcher. We use AI (specifically Large Language Models) to read articles and add tags that let you filter the content. LLMs are brilliant at this job because they understand nuance and context in text. Corruption is tricky to pin down - it's subjective, often hard to spot, and takes many forms. Traditional keyword searches often miss relevant stories or pick up irrelevant ones. But LLMs can spot integrity-related content even when obvious words like 'bribery' or 'embezzlement' aren't there. This means we can process huge amounts of news in a way that wasn't possible before. Of course, like any human, the AI sometimes gets things wrong. This risk is higher with corruption - even experts argue about how to define it.

When we tag articles as integrity-related, we're not making accusations. We're simply noting that the AI found content directly linked to integrity concepts. And while a story's headline might not mention corruption, the AI reads the full article, so the relevant content is likely inside.

Important: Understanding Country Comparisons

The number of articles about a country does not indicate the actual level of corruption in that country. Several factors limit our ability to make direct country comparisons:

  • Press freedom: Countries with greater press freedom may appear to have more corruption simply because journalists can report on these issues more freely.
  • Language limitations: We currently only collect English language news, which means countries where English media is more prevalent will be overrepresented.
  • Internet access: Areas with higher internet penetration and more online news sources will have more reports available to our system.
  • Media attention: Some regions receive more international media coverage than others, regardless of the actual prevalence of integrity issues.

If your country seems to have few or many articles, this may simply reflect these data collection limitations rather than the actual situation on the ground. The tool is designed for exploring individual cases rather than making comparative judgments between countries.

We rely entirely on what news articles report. Just because we haven't tagged any stories about a particular type of corruption in a certain place doesn't mean it isn't happening there - it just means we haven't found English language news coverage that meets our specific criteria.

If you need more information about how we defined these categories, please email TI global health. We can send you the guidelines and prompts we used. Overall, we designed the categories to be flexible and practical rather than having strict definitions

In summary:

  • We do not have all data on corruption everywhere. We have tried to get as much as is available but that is limited by a number of factors including press freedom, internet access etc.
  • Our data is only collected from publications 2023 onwards. This, combined with the previous point, means certain articles may not be present.
  • Whilst outputs have been independently verified by humans in the development phase of this tool, it is designed to run semi-automatically without human oversight on an article-by-article basis. This also means we cannot manually upload news articles that are not captured.
  • AI is imperfect. Whilst we are confident that the classifications are as accurate as they can be without much more time and resource, LLMs have their own biases and misunderstandings. This means classifications can be wrong or not align with TI Global Health's view.
  • An article being tagged in a particular category of integrity does not accuse anyone of anything untoward. It simply means that the AI has found some content of the article to be relevant to that specific categorisation.

1. Introduction

Welcome to the Global Health Atlas ("the Tool"), a project by Transparency International (UK). By accessing or using the Tool, you agree to comply with and be bound by these Terms of Use.

2. Permitted Use

You are granted a limited license to access and use the Tool for personal, non-commercial, and informational purposes only. This includes viewing the data on the dashboard and using the provided "Export" function to download a limited set of metadata (article title, date, and link) for personal analysis and reporting.

3. Prohibited Uses

You may not, directly or indirectly:

  • Use the Tool or any data derived from it for any commercial purposes.
  • Resell, sublicense, or redistribute any data obtained from the Tool to any third party.
  • Use the Tool to create a service or product that is competitive with the Tool or its underlying data provider.
  • Use any automated means, such as bots or scrapers, to access or copy data from the Tool.
  • Remove or obscure any proprietary notices, including attribution to our data provider.

4. Intellectual Property

The underlying news data is the property of our data provider. You are not granted any license to the underlying full-text news content. You must not, directly or indirectly: (i) reverse engineer, decompile, copy, mirror, disassemble, or otherwise attempt to discover or reproduce the source code, object code, or underlying structure, feature, function, user interface, ideas, know-how, or algorithms

5. Attribution

Where you present or cite data obtained from the Tool in any report, publication, website, or other external publicity, you must provide clear attribution, for example: "Data sourced from the Global Health Atlas by Transparency International (UK), powered by data from Newscatcher."

6. Disclaimer and Limitation of Liability

The Tool and all data are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Transparency International (UK) is not liable for any damages arising from the use of the Tool.

If your questions have not been answered here please contact:

+ 44 (0)20 3096 7676
[email protected]

This project is funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

GIZ Logo